Ron Miller's discussions

Well, a lot of the costumes were based on stories and novels popular 40 years ago, many of which probably aren't so familiar any longer, so you probably shouldn't feel too bad. Read more

My wife made it (she's the real craftsman in the family...that's also her in the gold suit as Captain Judikha). It took her about a week. The torso was made from a mold taken off a store mannequin while the arms and head were sculpted by her. Read more

It was from a book, but for the life of me I can't remember what it was. Read more

Yeah...I think that's what Wendy was doing. Read more

Almost all of them were based on popular characters at the time. For instance, the last one was a character from the Gor series. Read more

I was Tars Tarkas...love to see the photo you got! Read more

I would think that if you are doing cosplay as a business it is no longer cosplay. Read more

I would think that if you are doing cosplay as a business it is no longer cosplay. Read more

The plural of femme fatale is femmes fatale. Read more

I apologize, I had forgotten that you had said at the very outset that you are not a creationist. Read more

Well, tell me what part of creationism is supportable by evidence and experiment, and if creationists—-yourself included—-would abandon the theory if evidence showed that it was fallacious and I will gladly withdraw my comment. Read more

Attributing everything to magic and then believing you have arrived at an answer is ignorant and uneducated...to say nothing of monumentally naive. Read more

One of the problems with the Flood is that there is not only no evidence suggesting it ever took place, there is evidence that it did not. Read more

The basic premise of George's article was that creationists simply have no rational argument for their "theory." In order to make creationism work, they have to ignore evidence and experiment...or worse, they twist, rewrite or alter the evidence to fit a theory that is intrinsically immutable. This is not science and… Read more

How do you mix creationism and evolution? Read more

Creationists of both camps by necessity have to ignore scientific evidence because they both share the same basic premise...a premise that is immutable regardless of what evidence or experiment may suggest. Read more

Creationism of any variety is both nonsense and non-science. Old Earth Creationism and Young Earth Creationism both depend upon non-negotiable acceptance of certain basic tenets. Tenets that are unalterable. When evidence to the contrary is presented, this evidence must be either revised or ignored. This is precisely… Read more

I think George made it perfectly clear that Loeb was being quoted out of context by the creationists. Read more

I've often heard creationists make this analogy: If you spread all the parts of a 747 across a field they will never combine on their own to make a Jumbo Jet. Likewise, they say, something as complex as a living creature could never have come to pass through evolution alone. Read more

I agree. Creationists of both camps agree on one thing: that their basis premise is "non-negotiable." This means that their beliefs are inarguable, regardless of any evidence to the contrary. Read more